Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) Opinion 736 - Lawyer May Concurrently Serve as Municipal Prosecutor and Planning Board Attorney in the Same Municipality; Superseding Opinions 452 and 366

dc.contributor.authorSupreme Court of New Jersey
dc.contributor.authorNew Jersey. Administrative Office of the Courts
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T15:20:09Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T15:20:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-25
dc.descriptionDownloaded from https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/notices.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.govdoc974.905 C88
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10929/79143
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTrenton, N.J.: Office of the Courtsen_US
dc.subjectNew Jerseyen_US
dc.subjectCourtsen_US
dc.subjectNoticesen_US
dc.titleAdvisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) Opinion 736 - Lawyer May Concurrently Serve as Municipal Prosecutor and Planning Board Attorney in the Same Municipality; Superseding Opinions 452 and 366en_US
dc.title.alternativeNotices to the Bar and Supreme Court Ordersen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
C88_2019-7-25a-ACPE - Opinion 736 n190806b.pdf
Size:
151.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: