Public hearing before New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission: testimony concerning whether the death penalty serves a legitimate penological intent, such as deterrence; whether the penological interest in executing some of those guilty of murder is sufficiently compelling that the risk of an irreversible mistake is acceptable; whether the death penalty is consistent with evolving standards of decency: [July 19, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /meeting recorded and transcribed by the Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit
dc.contributor.author | New Jersey. Death Penalty Study Commission | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-31T15:32:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-31T15:32:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 974.90 C244 2006 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10929/21642 | |
dc.subject | Capital punishment-New Jersey | en_US |
dc.subject | Capital punishment-Moral and ethical aspects-New Jersey | en_US |
dc.subject | Capital punishment-New Jersey-Public opinion. | en_US |
dc.title | Public hearing before New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission: testimony concerning whether the death penalty serves a legitimate penological intent, such as deterrence; whether the penological interest in executing some of those guilty of murder is sufficiently compelling that the risk of an irreversible mistake is acceptable; whether the death penalty is consistent with evolving standards of decency: [July 19, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /meeting recorded and transcribed by the Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1