Deatlh Penalty Study Commission Reports

DSpace Repository

DSpace Home
New Jersey State Publications Digital Library
State Agencies, Commissions, Authorities etc.
Death Penalty Study Commission
Deatlh Penalty Study Commission Reports

Digital Jerseyana Collection | New Jersey State Publications Digital Library| About NJ Digital Collections

Deatlh Penalty Study Commission Reports

Browse by

Recent Submissions

New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission report

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2007)
Public hearing [October 11, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /New Jersey State Legislature Death Penalty Study Commission

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2006)
Public hearing before New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission :testimony concerning whether the selection of defendants for capital trials is arbitrary, unfair, or discriminatory; whether there is unfair, arbitrary, or discriminatory variability in the sentencing phase or at any stage of the process; and whether there is a significant difference in the crimes of those selected for the punishment of death as opposed to those who receive life in prison : [September 27, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /meeting recorded and transcribed by the Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2006)
New Jersey death penalty study :commission meeting : [September 13, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /State of New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2006)
Commission meeting of New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission :commission will hear testimony from the following experts: R. Erik Lillquist, Honorable John J. Gibbons, and Joseph Krakora : [August 16, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /meeting recorded and transcribed by the Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2006)
Public hearing before New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission :testimony concerning whether the death penalty serves a legitimate penological intent, such as deterrence; whether the penological interest in executing some of those guilty of murder is sufficiently compelling that the risk of an irreversible mistake is acceptable; whether the death penalty is consistent with evolving standards of decency : [July 19, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey] /meeting recorded and transcribed by the Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit

New Jersey.Death Penalty Study Commission (2006)
Final report /Governor's Study Commission on the Implementation of the Death Penalty

New Jersey. Study Commission on the Implementation of the Death Penalty (1998)

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

All of DSpace
This Collection
- By Issue Date
- Authors
- Titles
- Subjects

Discover

RSS Feeds